Privacy requirements and governance
Translate relevant privacy requirements into responsibilities, policies and an implementation plan.
Certified Privacy Implementation Professional — a proposed practitioner-focused credential, to be issued by DPCI.
In development — register your interest
CPIP is being developed to assess practical judgement: understanding a requirement, designing a workable response and demonstrating evidence of implementation.
The proposed credential is intended to help candidates demonstrate practical privacy competence through scenario-based judgement, implementation work and supporting evidence. Its focus is on capabilities relevant to professional practice.
Privacy, compliance, legal, risk and audit professionals; technology, cybersecurity and data-governance teams; and students or professionals developing an interest in privacy careers.
Proposed learning outcomes focus on applying knowledge and explaining implementation choices.
Translate relevant privacy requirements into responsibilities, policies and an implementation plan.
Map data flows, uses, systems and owners across collection, use, retention and disposal.
Design understandable notices and practical workflows for requests, preferences and grievances.
Identify privacy risks, evaluate third-party practices and document proportionate controls.
Develop a coordinated response approach with clear roles, escalation and evidence handling.
Define measures, maintain implementation evidence and communicate progress to decision-makers.
Assessment design, marking criteria and administrative arrangements remain under development.
Apply privacy knowledge and judgement to realistic organisational situations.
Develop a response to a defined implementation problem and organise supporting evidence.
Explain your approach, assumptions and implementation choices in a focused discussion.
A course completion record, where offered, would recognise completion of a learning programme under its published terms. It would not by itself award CPIP.
The proposed CPIP credential would require meeting the separately published assessment and certification requirements. Attending a DPCI course would not guarantee a certification decision.
The proposed framework will address honesty, confidentiality, responsible handling of information and accurate representation of credentials.
We intend to develop a continuing education and renewal framework. Activities, evidence, intervals and any associated fees are not yet finalised.
The intended approach includes transparent criteria, management of conflicts, separation of training and certification decisions, and a fair review and appeals process.
Not yet. The programme is in development. Expressions of interest help identify prospective participation; they do not secure admission or certification.
No. Fees, examination dates, pass marks, eligibility criteria and programme duration have not been finalised. Confirmed arrangements will be published before applications open.
No. Course completion and professional certification are distinct. The proposed credential requires a separate assessment and certification decision under the final published requirements.
The current proposal combines a scenario-based examination, a practical implementation project and a short discussion of that project. These arrangements may change during programme development.
DPCI is a private initiative of Paryoma Foundation. No government approval, statutory authority or accreditation is claimed. CPIP does not authorise legal practice.
DPCI intends to publish impartiality, conflict-management, assessment and appeals policies before certification applications open. These arrangements are under development.
Express your interest in CPIP and tell us about your professional context. Confirmed programme information will be published as development progresses.